What constellation is 1045 _ 10 15?

Graham Hancock's Theory of Orion's Three Stars

The theory that Orion corresponds to Samsung is a common theme in many books of Hankak. It was first put forward by Belgian and Egyptian archaeologist robert powell in 1983, and then it was further explained in the book co-authored with Hankak and their independent works. This paper expounds that the relative positions of the three pyramids of Giza in ancient Egypt are consistent with those of Orion's three-star belt.

At first, they just expounded the striking similarities between the two things. (... the three pyramids have become an incredible three-star map of Orion on earth; Refer to Hankak's Fingerprint of God, 1995, p. 375). Then they speculated on the age of the Sphinx in the guardian of Genesis. According to this book, the Sphinx was built in the late Paleolithic period 1500 BC. (... the lion's body faces the east and Leo at the dawn of the spring equinox in BC 10450); Refer to Hankak's Fingerprint of God, 1995, p. 483). In 1998 and robert powell's Secret of Mars, they thought that the arrangement of the Sphinx, the three pyramids of Giza and the Nile could be said to be the corresponding astronomical map of the constellation Lion, the constellation Orion and the Milky Way on the ground at that time.

Therefore, during the period of 12500 years ago, Hankak believed that there was an ancient developed civilization that influenced and radiated the development of ancient civilization in our world. However, orthodox Egyptology and archaeology insist that the existing evidence shows that the pyramids of Giza and the Sphinx were established in the fourth dynasty of ancient Egypt around 2500 BC. Hankak didn't argue about the age, but he insisted that they must have been built according to astronomy almost 8000 years ago.

This view put forward by Hancock, Powell and others, such as Adrian Gilbert and Anthony West, has been criticized and refuted by many scientists in their works.

In the voice of refutation, the research of Ed Krupp, an astronomer at Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles, and Anthony Fairall, a professor at Cape Town University in South Africa, has attracted people's attention. Using astronomical instruments, they independently studied the angle between the Samsung belt and the north direction in the period mentioned by Hankak and others (due to the influence of the precession of the vernal equinox, this angle is different from what we observed today or in the fourth dynasty). It is found that the angle between Samsung and the north is between 47 degrees and 50 degrees, while the angle between the pyramid and the north is 38 degrees.

Grip also pointed out that the straight line formed by the three pyramids of Giza deviates from the north, while the belt formed by Orion Samsung does face the south. If one is consistent with the other, only the high end of one line can be pulled down. This is indeed a change made by Powell and Gilbert in their co-authored book. They compared the inverted pyramid with the Samsung map without explanation.

Grip and Philo also found other problems in their theory. Including if the Sphinx represents the constellation Lion as they claim, then according to the map, it should be built on the other side of the Nile, not on the same side of the pyramid. And in BC 10500, the vernal equinox should be a virgo in the zodiac, not a Leo. The concept of ecliptic was created by ancient Mesopotamian civilization. Egypt didn't use it until the late Romanization of Greece. A critic named Joanne Conmen once used the word "evil" to describe grip's forceful refutation of this theory in his works. The same critic also criticized some of grip's views on ancient Egyptian astronomy. It is a pity that Hankak's theory is caused by various reasons.

This theory about the ancient Sphinx has gained more support in mainstream science. Robert Sarkozy, a famous geographer, compared the corrosion traces of flowing water around the Sphinx with the surrounding environment, and thought that some of the Sphinx should have been built before 5000-7000 BC at the latest. Sarkozy's analysis was supported by another geologist, David Ikle. He believes that the Sphinx has been washed away by a lot of rain, and the Giza Plateau only had this climate before the dynasty. Colin Read, the third geologist, thinks that it is only a few hundred years earlier than the recognized time. These views have been refuted by mainstream Egyptian scholars and quite a few geologists. They attributed the corrosion traces on the surface of the Sphinx to the industrial pollution in the world today, which led to the acidification of the statue by wind and dust, and the influence of temperature change on the stone surface.