Among the twelve constellations, it is the easiest to "get married early". Which constellation is fast stepping into the marriage hall?

We all know that today's young people regard life events as their own private affairs, and parents are no longer allowed to interfere casually. Parents are horrified to find that it seems that more and more children tend to marry later. Of course, for young people who choose to marry late, their purpose is mostly to enjoy the freedom of being single for a few more years, or to lack everything because they have not found a good marriage partner for the time being.

For most Pisces, the most important thing in the world is emotion, especially love. Without true love, they will be very miserable, and even give up their family or friendship for love. But in fact, there are people more terrible than fish who are crazy about love! That's a fish who sees through the world of mortals. Fish don't have to marry early, but they must fall in love early. Otherwise, if they continue to suffer in love for many years, with their sensitive, kind and persistent nature, these experiences will definitely break the fish's heart. Because fish are always too kind to the people they care about, people around them will inevitably forget that they will hate and be sad, and fish's love and hate are equally fierce. Therefore, Pisces, which regards love as the most important, is the easiest to get married early.

Followed by Capricorn, Capricorn's favorite is the Confucian golden mean. Their lives tend to follow the rules and keep pace with most people, and they will not deliberately be unconventional in their private lives. When dealing with emotional problems, Capricorn will insist on the way of "rational control of sensibility" as the leading idea of all decision-making. In Capricorn's view, people should do certain things when they reach a certain age, so their personality makes them not marry late like young people today. I think the step-by-step Capricorn ranks second.

The above only represents personal views, don't you think?