The concept of celestial bodies was used in the construction of Xianyang in Qin Dynasty. Compare the Weihe River to the milky way "Tianhe" of celestial bodies, and compare the palace to a constellatio

The concept of celestial bodies was used in the construction of Xianyang in Qin Dynasty. Compare the Weihe River to the milky way "Tianhe" of celestial bodies, and compare the palace to a constellation. There are many channels around, all salty. B

?

Analysis of test questions: According to the topic "Taking Xianyang Palace as the center, forming the pattern of the palace of stars and enclosing the screen of the imperial capital", we can see that it embodies the concept of supremacy of imperial power and centralization, which is the overall feature of China's ancient political system from Qin and Han Dynasties to Ming and Qing Dynasties. The other three items have some truth, but to some extent, they are all subordinate to item B.

Comments: The best multiple-choice question (degree multiple-choice question) means that among the four options, only one option meets the requirements of the topic most accurately and completely, and the other items have no obvious errors from the perspective of relevance, but they are incomplete and incomplete. ? So this kind of problem is confusing and difficult.

Degree-based multiple-choice questions mainly examine students' ability to accurately understand the basic concepts of history and dialectical thinking, that is, historical interpretation ability. There are two characteristics. 1. Compared with general multiple-choice questions, the most obvious structural feature of this kind of questions is that the relationship between the stem and the options is generally not a right or wrong relationship, but a relationship between quality and quantity, and the degree requirements are clearly put forward in the stem, such as "most", "fundamental", "comprehensive", "decisive" and "direct". Second, there is an internal relationship between the stem and the alternative, generally the relationship between arguments and arguments, and the relationship between explanation and explanation, explanation and explanation.