Fortune Telling Collection - Zodiac Analysis - Why did the mbti exam suddenly become popular? Is MBTI really reliable?

Why did the mbti exam suddenly become popular? Is MBTI really reliable?

The mbti exam is on fire. Many people went to the test and found it very accurate. This is a theoretical model for judging and analyzing personality. So, why is the MBTI exam suddenly hot? Is it really reliable? Let me introduce you.

Why did the mbti exam suddenly catch fire?

Mbti, to some extent, has replaced the constellation and become a new generation of dating weather vane. After remembering mbti's personality characteristics, you can turn on mbti radar and take the initiative to prevent lightning strikes in various scenes. From reality to virtual, from people to things, mbti, once just a psychological category, has become a universal template for "everything can be measured"

Maybe you don't know what MBTI is. Simply put, it is the most popular professional personality assessment tool in the world. As a judgment and analysis of personality, it is a theoretical model.

More and more young people are beginning to pay attention to "MBTI test". Overnight, the "MBTI test" almost surpassed the constellation test and became a new social fashion.

The ultimate three questions of "Who am I", "What kind of person am I" and "What do I want" are always put forward by many young people who care about the spiritual world. In today's fast-paced, efficient and high-pressure urban life, people's attention to mental health has reached an unprecedented height. Under this premise, MBTI test is widely used in different social backgrounds.

Telling your "MBTI secret password" is like telling someone your horoscope and blood type. Similar or complementary, can be a topic, can quickly close the interpersonal distance. In addition, the exchange of psychological test results also reveals a potential message-"I am very concerned about my mental health", which is considered as a positive attitude towards life among young people.

Of course, in this process, we should also be wary of simple and rude "labeling". Judging yourself by the results of psychological evaluation is likely to limit your development, just like adding an invisible "ceiling" to your life and reminding yourself that "I can only reach this height"; Labeling others can effectively realize "people are divided into groups" and save social costs, but it will also lose more opportunities to know each other.

Everyone is a unique individual with a mixed personality. This dichotomy is too simple and rude, and there are few extremes that completely meet the characteristics. Therefore, it is meaningless to insist that you are a certain personality and forcibly become a sixteen-type personality. I heard that mbti doesn't recognize it academically, so let's take it as a small reference.

Is MBTI really reliable?

In fact, MBTI in The Cloak of Mind was compiled by non-psychological professionals. Therefore, MBTI can be regarded as the product of "folk science" to some extent.

MBTI's questionnaire compared your performance at that time. If you happen to be happy on the day of the exam and choose the option of "actively participating in everyone's conversation", you may end up extroverted, and one day you will be depressed and introverted.

The researchers found that the retest reliability of MBTI was very low [6]. Some research groups invited people to take MBTI tests twice before and after five weeks, and 50% of them got different measurement results in one or more dimensions.

Effectiveness is effectiveness, that is, whether the measured thing is effective [8]. For example, if you want to test the math level of middle school students in China, you should use the English version of the math test paper. Is that inappropriate?

However, Sip and Alexander of university of akron verified the structural validity of MBTI, and found that its structural validity was very low and the factor structure was unstable.

"MBTI test" is a reasonable professional personality test, but it is only a psychological test.