What do you think of Seven Bullies? "Travel through the time machine and see that you are not together after 10 years. Will you still pursue love?" This debate?

"I waded through mountains and rivers, I cut through thorns, you are not the end, you are the reason."

The debate contest of the 6th.2 issue of "Qi Pa Shuo" really opened my eyes, but it also touched me deeply.

The argument goes like this: I'm chasing someone I like very much, and TA seems to be interested in me, but I found through the time machine that it wasn't TA who was with me ten years later. Should I "chase" or "give up"

In fact, this debate is: is the time machine credible+do I still want to be together when I know I'm breaking up?

The brain hole about the time machine opened by Zhang Quanling and Yan Rujing is the most interesting part of the whole debate. And the question of "do you want to be together when you know that you want to break up" is also a realistic problem that many people face in our real life. So I was very excited when I wrote this article. I have a lot to say, and I want to know your thoughts.

As usual, let's take a look at the views of both sides first.

Positive point of view: go after it.

The reason for this is the following：

The people you love make you.

② The time machine itself is not reliable.

When we know that we will die, we are still alive. We should cherish everyone in our lives.

Objection: Don't chase.

The reason for this is the following：

You can't embrace this relationship at all, and you can't enjoy it.

(2) Ignoring the feelings of the other two people in the story.

Because the end of life is doomed, we really don't have time to cherish everyone.

My opinion: I still want to be with you when I know I'm breaking up.

The reason for this is the following：

(1) Finding the scene through the time machine is not reliable.

I'm afraid it's over before it starts.

High energy warning ahead!

First, the scene discovered through the time machine is inherently unreliable.

A time machine means that we can travel in time. At present, the most mature idea about time travel is to realize time travel through wormholes. Wormholes can connect two different time and space, which can be two different universes or two different places in the same universe.

Now that we have seen the past through the time machine, it means that time travel is established and the wormhole is also established. Since the wormhole was established, parallel universes have also been established.

Let's explain what a parallel universe is, also called (multi-world interpretation). Simply put:

"Parallel universe refers to other universes that are separated from a certain universe and exist in parallel with the original universe. They are both similar and different. In these universes, there are universes born under the same conditions as us, there may be planets with the same history as the planet where human beings live, and there may be people exactly like human beings. At the same time, in these different universes, the development of things will have different results: species that have been extinct in our universe may continue to evolve in another universe. "

In the famous "single electron double slit experiment", electrons actually interfere after passing through the double slit. According to classical mechanics, electrons can only pass through a slit at the same time, so it is impossible to interfere. But in the eyes of quantum mechanics, the state of electrons exists in the form of wave function (distribution probability of microscopic particles in space), and electrons may pass through two slits at the same time and interfere. But when scientists try to observe with an instrument, the instrument can only detect that electrons only pass through one slit at a time. Bohr, a famous physicist, put forward the famous "Copenhagen Explanation", saying that when the observer appears, the electron has an accurate position. This means that the wave function of the electron will "collapse" to a certain point when the observer appears. However, the explanation about how the observation happened and when the "collapse" happened is not very clear and convincing.

Everett put forward a bold idea that the wave function does not need to "collapse" at all. In fact, both possibilities have happened, but the whole world is superimposed: people in one world find their electrons passing through the slit on the left, while in the other world, they are on the right! Quantum processes create two worlds!

Schrodinger's cat is no longer obsessed with life and death. The universe is divided into two parts, one has a live cat and the other has a dead cat.

Everything that may happen in history and in the future has actually happened or will happen! It's just that in some other universes, there is no connection with our universe, and we don't know it. According to Occam's razor principle, other universes are meaningless to us.

So in the debate, the scene seen through the time machine may take place in another universe, which has nothing to do with our universe and has no meaning to us!

How can you influence your decision at this time because of a completely meaningless thing! So, even if I find that it's not Ta who is with me ten years later, I still want to be with Ta. After all, who knows what world I have seen!

Second, the biggest fear is that it will be over before it starts.

In our real life, there are too many loves that will not come together because of various factors. So this topic is still very attractive, as follows,

In fact, this debate is no longer a question of chasing or not, which can be directly extended to: I know when to break up, should I start?

For a Gemini who knows mountains and tigers, I have no idea why there is such a problem!

Then I really want to ask a question, what is love? This eternal question.

Ma Weiwei said that love is a crocodile in a deep pool. I was warned, but I have to go there. Obviously, there are vicious dogs in the yard, and I have been warned. I have to rush in, because my princess is on the tower and my prince is underwater.

Wong Kar-wai said, I haven't ridden a motorcycle for a long time, and I haven't tried to be so close to a person for a long time, although I know this road is not very far. I know I'm getting off soon. However, this minute, I feel so warm.

Wang Xiaobo said that when I think of you, my ugly face smiles.

Charlotte Brontexq said, who said it was winter? When you are by my side, I feel flowers blooming and birds chirping.

Tagore said that his eyes are raining for you, but his heart is holding an umbrella for you.

......

If you ask me what love is, I can only say this question.

I really can't do this question of love.

But knowing that we will break up, I still want to be with you.

The reasons are as follows,

The purpose of love is not to grow old together.

Love is emotional.

I know I'm going to die, so I don't live.

I think love is a process of mutual realization. Later, the road we traveled, the books we read and the people we loved all became me now. I've been thinking, if marriage and having children are excluded from life planning, I wonder how much energy we will have to pursue our dreams and how much courage we will have to enjoy life.

Besides, I think love is very emotional. When I meet someone I like so much, even if Ta doesn't like me, it's hard for me to give up. Not to mention Ta still likes me. How can you not be together when you meet someone you like so much? How hard it is to meet someone you like.

In general, everything we do has results. How many people say that it is only for the process, not for the result, it is nonsense. Many things are really the result of supporting us to go on, but love is not a goal, but a process. On this road of life, some things are really more important, such as love. After all, everyone will die.

"I foresee all the sadness, but I am still willing to go." -"Arrival"

Anyway, I will be together after all.

I am not gentle, only brave.

(The pictures are all from the Internet and have been deleted. )