Which notebook should I buy for 4000-5000? And then buy it years ago or years later? Will it be cheaper?

After reading patiently, although a lot of content will be a little dizzy, it will definitely play a very effective guiding role for you. The above is the summary of my experience that I spent the whole afternoon typing ~

Main contents:

1. The so-called "cost performance" is a lie.

2. The "cost performance" between different brands is actually the same.

3. Choose the real "cost performance": analyze the mobile CPU.

4. Add another one about how to choose the one that suits you best.

1. The first question that many people think of when buying books is which book has the highest "cost performance". I don't know that "cost performance" has become a big trap when buying a machine.

I have always stressed that "there is no cost performance between different brands". If you don't understand, compare Shenzhou with IBM, but I want to tell you that Shenzhou is so cheap, there is still money to ask Chris Lee to endorse it, and IBM's notebook is so expensive that Lenovo bought it at a loss!

So there are many problems. Many consumers are chasing this so-called "cost-effective" when buying a machine. I want to say that this thing is actually a concept used by merchants to fool people.

For example, for a notebook, the cost of the monitor accounts for a quarter of the cost of the whole machine, but will any brand tell you what grade of monitor it uses? There are also differences in screen quality, such as service life. Good screens, such as those of Sharp of ASUS or BenQ, can be dimmed after two or three years' use, while those of Shenzhou generally feel dull after one year's use. There are also various parameters and specifications such as brightness, viewing angle, black and white response time, bright and dark spot rate.

For example, a DIY expert will understand the gap between good board and slag board in workmanship level and the resulting price gap. Although you can't feel it when you use it, the quality is very different.

For example, the cost of after-sales service, people often ask me how cheap Dell looks. I said that you should also see the bottom line of all Dell advertisements, "If you want to upgrade to X years of after-sales service, please add XX money", and the warranty period, which is also part of the price and an important part that is easily overlooked. Please add this thing first, and then compare it with other brands.

Therefore, I suggest that you choose a big brand (guaranteed quality, a penny for a penny) when the configuration is sufficient and suitable for you (don't pursue high configuration, of course, playing games with IBM is rich, and it is dangerous to install important documents with China).

Under the premise of constant capital, high matching and high quality are inversely proportional, understand?

Finally, I will give you a notebook brand ranking for your reference.

First place: IBM Think Pad series. Commonly known as "little black", unchanging color and style. As the father of modern personal computers, IBM's notebooks have the best quality, status and price. There are more than 1000 patented technologies in the notebook field (such as the father of hard disk), and ThinkPad is the first choice for notebook enthusiasts who pursue performance, portability, stability and ease of use.

Second place: Apple MAC series. It is called Mac not only because it is produced by Apple, but also because its core is different from IBM standard PC. It is the "best player in the world" outside the pc. It can be understood as apple = streamlined IBM plus streamlined Microsoft. Because it is only white, commonly known as "little white". If there were no mistakes in the decision-making in those years, the status of IBM Think Pad series should be the MAC series now. If IBM is the most practical and powerful notebook, then Apple is the most artistic and Martian notebook. Of course, the price is also artistic.

Third place: Compaq under HP. Compaq could almost compete with IBM in the mainstream pc field at that time. Now, although it is owned by HP, it still uses Compaq logo. At the beginning, Compaq was almost synonymous with business notebooks, and its quality and reputation were evident. Note: Compaq for home use is not as good as commercial use.

Fourth place: Fujitsu. Fujitsu is known as Japan's "IBM" and a well-deserved "boss" of Japanese notebooks. Pc is full of standards formulated by oligarchs such as IBM, Fujitsu, Compaq and Toshiba. Fujitsu is known as the "world notebook computer expert", and of course the price is also the "boss" level.

Fifth place: Toshiba. Toshiba claims to be the founder of "the first real notebook computer in the world". However, it has recently taken the fashion route, and the quality is somewhat rough compared with Fujitsu. After the fifth place, it is not easy to arrange, because the basic design is similar and the quality is comparable. Just make a casual arrangement. In other words, the rankings of the five major brands are basically recognized by everyone, and the following order is somewhat different.

Sixth place: NEC. 1989, NEC made the world's first notebook computer with color LCD. In the notebook field, NEC's LCD R&D and manufacturing technology has always been in the forefront of the world, and its sales in Japan have always followed Fujitsu. However, apart from the LCD screen, there are not many bright spots in quality.

Seventh place: Sony. Sony 1997 began to enter the notebook field, and has always taken the route of "fashion and high-end", so "beauty" has become the biggest selling point (personally feeling ugly). But it is weak in stability, safety, durability and politics. It can be said that buying Sony is nothing more than a brand.

Eighth place: Dell. Dell is a miracle in the IT industry. 1996 set foot in the notebook field, and in just a few years, its sales volume became the first in the world. But Dell's cost system also restricts its development in high-end notebooks. Dell has become the representative of "low-cost notebook". Indeed, its quality is nothing to boast about, especially the heat dissipation, which has many problems.

Ninth place: ASUS. Asus is the pride of China Computer. It insists on "independent brand design, manufacturing and sales", so it has good compatibility, completely solves the heat dissipation problem, and has innovative workmanship from time to time, so it is called "rock-solid", which makes sense. Out of personal feelings, I will list them here. Anyway, the quality is better than Lenovo

Tenth place: SUMSUNG. 200 1 only entered the notebook field, completely adopting Japanese style and taking the visual route, but the most critical heat dissipation technology of notebook has great loopholes. And the design and production are outsourced to some professional notebook manufacturers in Taiwan Province Province. It has great advantages in cost control. In other words, Samsung is the Sony of South Korea, but if we say that "there is nothing worth buying Sony except the brand", it is not worth buying a brand at all. Not as good as domestic Lenovo.

My answer is over. It's not very professional, but it really helps you. Thank you!