Constellation men and women born with a bad king _ Constellation men and women born with a bad king are paired

What is the difference between a bad king and a tyrant in history? Are bad kings and tyrants the same? Reveal the secret.

Speaking of tyrants and bad kings, it's actually quite interesting. Most people think that these two kings should be one. I thought so at first, but in fact, after studying, you will find that this is not the case, because there is still a very big difference between a tyrant and a bad king. So what are their specific differences? Let's follow me to analyze the secrets. Interested netizens must not miss it!

In fact, when you open the Modern Chinese Dictionary, you can see that the explanation of a bad king is a bad king, and the explanation of a tyrant is a tyrannical monarch. Although simple, it accurately summarizes the difference between a bad king and a tyrant. So, what is the difference between a bad king and a tyrant?

1, bad king

The so-called "fatuity" is ignorance, and fatuity and fatuity are the consequences of ignorance. A bad king is a group of people who may be born with low IQ, low EQ, or low EQ and IQ because of their growing environment. The representative of this aspect is Sima Zhong, the Emperor of Jinhui. He is the second son of Sima Yan, Emperor Wu of Jin Dynasty. Because his younger brother died young, he became the actual eldest son of Emperor Wu of Jin. He is characterized by natural dullness and stupidity. When the minister reported to him that the people were too hungry to eat, he left a famous saying "Why not eat minced meat".

Moreover, due to their limited ability to govern the country, they are generally not keen on governing the country to "expose their shortcomings." Most of them especially trust some eunuchs or ministers around them and rely on them to handle political affairs. Hide in the field, enjoy yourself and ignore political affairs. The typical representative of this aspect is Chen, who lives in luxury and builds a large scale, regardless of state affairs, feasting with concubines day and night.

In addition, because of his fatuity and incompetence, most of the throne fell from the sky, neither an entrepreneur nor the courage to fight for it.

2. Tyrant

The so-called "violence" represents malice, bullying, tyranny and cruelty, which are the extended meanings of violence. Generally speaking, the tyrant's violence has little to do with his ability, but has a great defect in his character. This led to their abuse of power and meanness and ingratitude. Moreover, some tyrants in the history of China are typical, and there may be very capable monarchs.

For example, Emperor Yangdi made great contributions to pacify the south of the Yangtze River in the battle to destroy Chen, and deliberately defeated the former prince in the battle to seize the office. After he succeeded to the throne, he built the East Capital, built the Beijing-Hangzhou Canal to connect the north and the south, attacked Tuguhun and so on. However, due to his violent personality, he was harsh on people and eager for success, which eventually led to national subjugation.

3, both faint and violent

Of course, in some cases, a bad king and a tyrant are interlinked. Some monarchs are addicted to pleasure because of their low ability, and are afraid of the instability of their throne. They often want to use "imposing" means to treat them badly.

Representatives in this regard may be Qin Ershi and Hu Hai. Thanks to chance and the unremitting efforts of master Zhao Gao, he finally ascended the throne, and his ideal is to enjoy himself in a fleeting life. However, it is difficult to shock ministers and other descendants of Qin Shihuang, because they are worried about their lack of ability. He trusted Zhao Gaoda to show his punishment, even at the expense of forcing all the other descendants of Qin Shihuang to death. I don't know anything about Zhao Gao, but it's hard to say that death is death in the end.

In a word, it is hard to say that bad kings and tyrants are good rulers. A bad king may have some benevolent qualities, while a tyrant seems to have many capable qualities. But fatuity and incompetence, like tyranny, can not make the rule unfold smoothly, but will accumulate contradictions sooner or later. In the end, it will bring irreparable consequences to the country they rule.

reference data

1, Lv Simian: General History of China, Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2009.