What do you think of Zhu's performance in the exciting invitation?

In the second issue of Exciting offer, several students are facing more and more challenges.

From the initial case analysis to the subsequent direct debate, during this period, some people fought back one after another, and some people's popularity continued to decline. Among them, the most obvious contrast may be Zhu and Zhan.

Let's talk about Jan first.

Zhan ranked second in the first round of tests, but failed to enter the "first batch of interns". At that time, according to He Jiong's analysis, Zhan's overall state was very good, but she was too quiet, which was a shortcoming.

Later, when talking with Zhan, Shi Law gave the same reasons for refusing as He Jiong. It can be seen that in the workplace, in the case of all newcomers, everyone really prefers lively people. Like Zhu, Zhu and Zhu are typical representatives of "lively school".

I brought a pet doll on my first day at work, and then I acted as an "active atmosphere" on various occasions. Zhu's performance at first was really pleasing to the eye, and even He Laoshi in the back observation room couldn't help praising her.

However, with the advent of the debate, Zhu's reputation has taken a turn for the worse. Why? There is something wrong with the basis of the debate!

"Drinking doesn't necessarily pose a challenge to your health", "No one is teetotal" and "A pregnant woman is no different from me" (Zhu).

What do you think of this view? In the original words of Shi Law, "this is a challenge to social justice."

Therefore, at this stage, Zhu is no longer a pure debate, but basically speaks in a "wrangling" way. This undoubtedly exposed another shortcoming of Zhu: in order to win the game, he would mess around.

There is no suspense in the result, because Zhu's "single-handedness" just made his team lose the debate. But even at this time, Zhu still didn't realize his problems and felt good about himself.

When communicating with the winning team in the later period, Zhu bluntly said: "It doesn't matter, I have won many best debaters." How dare you mention "the best debater" at this time? Cover up your shortcomings with your past title? Sorry, not only the audience doesn't pay the bill, but even the tutor doesn't care.

Soon, Guo Law called the defeated players to a meeting separately. At the meeting, Guo Lu directly pointed out Zhu's problems and clearly pointed out Zhu's views. In particular, Guo Lu also conveyed the words, especially reminding Zhu: Don't say that ordinary people are uncomfortable, even those who drink so often won't listen.

So, if we can talk from a distance, I really want to ask Zhu: Are those "best debaters" laurels won at school still stable?

Interestingly, perhaps Guo Law's words really hit the soft spot.

As soon as the camera turns, the group meeting has just ended. Unexpectedly, Zhu, who was lively by nature, burst into tears and ran to talk with his senior colleagues.

If a girl starts crying, it's easy to win sympathy. But Zhu's own reasons for crying make people laugh and cry.

Zhu claimed: Guo Lv's words reminded me of the memory of losing the game in the past three years. What do you mean? It turned out that Zhu also lost many games in the previous campus debate, and the judges had clearly pointed out that the reason for losing was "the opponent's speech was too ugly."

Oh! It turns out that Zhu's "wrangling" is an old problem, and he has stepped on many pits, which hasn't changed? That can only be said: I cried this time. After all, they are all in the workplace, not as tolerant as schools.

Of course, then again. Newcomers in the workplace are bound to make mistakes. Many friends who didn't watch the program may wonder: even if Zhu's views are really controversial, they won't be so unpopular.

In fact, Zhu's problem was exposed before the debate began.

For example, when everyone was preparing the debate draft, Zhu obviously went to another group to "find out" the news himself. The other group did not evade and still discussed normally. But this generous operation, in Zhu's thinking, was interpreted as: "Their quality was deliberately discussed when I went, and something leaked to me to disturb my mind."

Well, I can only say that everyone is fine, fine.

Fortunately, Zhu's teammates were still sober and immediately refuted Zhu: "Aren't they all right? Won't they do that? You think too much. " What does this mean? Explain "character", although everyone usually doesn't say it, they all see it in their eyes. If we give a narration to Liu Yucheng's heart at this moment, it is probably: After the debate, we can't be in the same group again.

And the program group is also "good". Just after saying this sentence, the cameraman specially gave Zhu a close-up of an expression. In this wave of operation, it is still the same sentence: everyone is good, everyone is good.

Finally, I have to praise He Jiong in particular.

He Laoshi has always been a "warm man". Therefore, at the end of the program, Zhu seems to have a bad reputation. He Jiong secretly took the lead, guiding all the guests to help Zhu rehabilitate.

The reason given by He Jiong is: "Zhu is the youngest of these students, so his way of speaking is straightforward and easy to understand". Yang Tianzhen, who got the message, praised Zhu from another angle: "I think she is a very talented person."

In other words, we can certainly understand Mr He Jiong's kindness. But on the whole, Sa Beining's view may be more commendable.

Because Teacher Sa said: A "prickly" way of communication like Zhu can be used occasionally when joking, but if this way is "normalized", it will be really bad.

I don't know what you think. After all, this is the workplace. It's hard to find a warm man like Mr. He Jiong in the workplace. If it's Sa Beining. If Zhu Neng heard you, it should benefit a lot, right? * * * Encourage!