Hong Ren, a professor in Yun-peng Yue, is angry that he has no education. How did Deyun Society respond?

Yun-peng Yue's cross talk is very good. I have worked with Sun Yue for many years, and gradually moved from a small theater to a big stage. Many people know them and like them. However, there are many people who are red. A professor in Peking University angered Yun-peng Yue, saying that he was uneducated and didn't pretend to understand. Yun-peng Yue didn't respond. The peak of Deyun Society responded, saying that cross talk is a joke, so don't take it seriously.

First, Yun-peng Yue became popular. Professor Peking University complained that he had no education, and Deyun Society responded with domineering.

There is a lot of body language in Yun-peng Yue's cross talk, and occasionally Yun-peng Yue laughs. These are some minor shortcomings of Yun-peng Yue's cross talk. Many listeners will forgive Yun-peng Yue because his performance on the stage is very real. However, some people are strict, such as a professor at Peking University.

Professor Peking University is a Chinese department, and his research on characters is naturally in place. He is also right to say that Yun-peng Yue has no culture. Because Yun-peng Yue didn't say the number of words in Xinhua Dictionary, he didn't fight it seriously. Are these questions? Indeed; Should I criticize? It really should be.

However, many people know that Yun-peng Yue's cultural level is limited. Criticizing Yun-peng Yue from this angle is a bit excessive. Degang Guo, the monitor of Deyun Society, didn't speak, but Gao Feng had a different understanding of this. He thinks crosstalk is an art, which is true. But there are some mistakes in cross talk, and everyone agrees.

Even if it is wrong, no one will correct it. Many crosstalk performers made mistakes and no one corrected them. The characters in the cross talk are originally half a bottle hanging around. This is not a lecture on couplets, so there is no need to be demanding. Of course, if you know, it would be better to change it. An example is also given. 1987 Spring Festival Evening crosstalk "Qiao Duyin" is wrong, so we don't criticize it.

The meaning of Gao Feng's remarks is obvious, that is, Professor Peking University is demanding perfection and accusing. It is not that he is wrong, but that he is too demanding. And cross talk is about interaction and joy. If it is full of words and pearls, many people don't want to listen to it. As Degang Guo said, listening to cross talk is like listening to a gobbledygook, so people won't listen.

Second, Yun-peng Yue's culture is indeed limited, but cross talk is an art and an art of communication.

Yun-peng Yue's culture is indeed limited, because he has no higher education and doesn't have much time to study. Because I was very young, I wandered the rivers and lakes, worked as a security guard, worked as a noodle restaurant, and then went to Deyun Society to clean up. Isn't it an inspirational story that such a person with limited culture can become a cross talk actor that everyone likes?

Yun-peng Yue himself knows that culture is limited, so he said so when he performed cross talk. When I performed "Brother De Yun" on the stage of "Happy Comedian", I said that my cultural level was limited. This fact is acknowledged by everyone, and Professor Peking University also said that it is a bit picky.

Yun-peng Yue also knew that his culture was limited, so he spent a lot of energy learning cross talk. Degang Guo once said that many people in Deyun suggested that he fire Yun-peng Yue. However, Degang Guo said that if Yun-peng Yue had something to eat, he would not starve to death. Yun-peng Yue succeeded by virtue of his strength, and he should have learned a lot.

Degang Guo didn't graduate from college either. Who would say that his education is limited? All the old crosstalk artists had no education. Who would say that they have no education? Crosstalk art is different from other art forms, because this art form needs interaction, that is, smashing. Deyun Society was seriously damaged, whether it was Degang Guo, Yu Qian, Yun-peng Yue, Sun Yue and others.

Professor Peking University only criticized others a little, which shows that his mind is not so broad. It is not that Professor Peking University is wrong, but that he has no tolerance for others. Yun-peng Yue's crosstalk is already very good, but it is a bit difficult to demand perfection.

3. Professor Peking University said that Yun-peng Yue's culture is limited, with more meanness than goodwill.

Professor Peking University is right. Yun-peng Yue really belongs to a company with limited culture. However, as a professor of Chinese Department of Peking University, he not only failed to teach well, but accused a person of limited cultural level. Is there a cultural limitation in this sentence itself? As a professor, do you know traditional culture? Even if others are wrong, can you point it out directly?

Is it what professors should say to say that human culture is limited? Some people say that Professor Peking University showed it to Yun-peng Yue for the good of Yun-peng Yue. From this perspective, it is possible. However, in terms of cultural accomplishment, it is wrong. At the very least, it is unkind.

Is it necessary for a professor from Peking University to point out other people's shortcomings in this way? Is there no other more tactful and comfortable way? If not, it means that the cultural knowledge of this Peking University professor is not very high (this knowledge refers to emotional intelligence)!

Does it need to be pointed out directly to survive and live in society? We all play together. Give us a face. But the professor of Peking University refused to give it, and directly killed people. Some people think that this is done to let Yun-peng Yue know what is wrong. Is this a bad discussion? Ask some questions of your own, won't you?

Some people say that this Peking University professor is such a straightforward person, and he is also kind. Good intentions may do bad things, is there wood? Don't talk about kindness just like don't talk about love. The practice of this Peking University professor gives people the impression that it is not a accusation, but a waste of traffic.

Professor Peking University's practice is really interesting. Although he usually likes to communicate in this way, he thinks it is better. This is his character, and no one will care. However, will others feel comfortable communicating with others in this way? He doesn't care! Good words mean kindness, and bad words mean selfishness. Kong said, don't do to others what you don't want them to do to you. I hope this Peking University professor will have a snack when he expresses his views! what do you think?