How to evaluate Yin Ye, CEO of Huada Gene, and his remarks?

When he quoted the very objective scientific knowledge in life, he woke up, which was not objective. If someone studies this part carefully, he may have learned the wrong knowledge. For example, there are 1000 kinds of bacteria, 10 minutes, 4,000 kinds of animals, 2 kg, 3 kg and so on.

Not all words are used in popular science. Generally speaking, I will talk about specific figures. If you don't know, just say 1000 or so, above 4000 and so on.

Even if the parthenogenesis is only a Komodo monitor lizard or lizard, they all say "cover your face" and "cover your face". Let's not talk about occasional parthenogenesis for the time being. Only periodic parthenogenesis and regular parthenogenesis include some bees, some aphids, some sharks, some shrimps, stick insects and so on.

As for the consistency of the flora inside, it is estimated that he said it casually and there is no scientific basis. Evolutionary biology and psychology have some conjectures in this respect, but they are not scientific basis. Not to mention what he said about the effect of colonial exchange.

It is ok for people to express their ideas, because everyone thinks according to their known knowledge system, but since we want to cite natural science, we should respect its objectivity and be more rigorous. As for arguments unrelated to science, different people have different opinions, depending on everyone's understanding and interest. To sum up, it can be said that the scientific knowledge in the video is completely ignorant.