Courtesy can't come back and forth, and indecent assault can't come back and forth.

1, explanation: reciprocity. It is impolite to give someone a favor and not get it in return; It is impolite for others to help themselves without returning.

2. Source: Excerpted from Book of Rites Quli.

Li advocates giving and receiving. Only talking about giving, not talking about returning, does not meet the requirements of etiquette; On the contrary, it is not in line with the etiquette requirements to talk about newspapers without telling stories.

3, explain:

China's traditional culture has a civilization history of 5,000 years. For five thousand years, China has been a country of etiquette, and China's ancestors are famous for their polite style. The "ceremony" in ancient China is a system, a rule and a social consciousness. "One" is the concrete expression of "Li" and a set of systematic and complete procedures based on the provisions and contents of "Li".

It is necessary for us to reform and inherit the principle of respecting the old and caring for the young, respecting the virtuous and valuing the road, being polite and courteous. Socialist core values effectively integrate social consciousness, highlight the country's governance system and governance capacity, and show the relationship between the country, society and individuals. Socialist core values are an important foundation for us to inherit Chinese excellent traditional culture.

Extended data:

The practical significance of reciprocity;

The practical significance of "reciprocity" today is to "strengthen the communication between people"

"reciprocity" does not mean giving gifts to each other. The so-called "communication" should refer to the communication between people. In communication, the so-called etiquette will be formed.

In ancient times, etiquette covered all aspects of life, and the ancients valued understanding etiquette. Of course, we say "enough is enough", and so is courtesy. Moderate ceremony will appear elegant, excessive ceremony will appear lack of realism, and so will doing things.

Throughout the evolutionary history of etiquette, if we compare it to a big tree, it was impenetrable at first, so we had to cut a piece from it and replant it. Landscape technicians of past dynasties only wanted to trim branches to make them look good, but the more they cut them, the more ugly they became. Moreover, the longer the tree grows, the heavier the decorations hanging on it, and the result can only be that the longer it is, the more crooked it is.

Today, when we review etiquette, we need to really understand its connotation, grasp its discretion and use it properly. This is the right way. Cut constantly, the "ceremony" is still chaotic, and we need to chew it from the beginning.