How about the new constellation schedule?

The conclusion of astrology is actually a theory summed up through thousands of years of statistics, and I don't think it can be changed overnight. Astrology has certain scientific basis, but after all, it is not a scientific research from the perspective of pure materialism.

Just like the sun constellation has changed for nearly a thousand years;

Another example is that there are actually 13 constellations on the ecliptic;

And Pluto is not a planet;

However, there is no further analysis of astrology based on the update of these astronomical knowledge.

The new constellation you see is reasonable in astronomy. If we really want to change the statistics of astrology for thousands of years, I am afraid it is not that simple. Even most of Skrill's own research believes in classical astrology. However, when the Japanese conclusion is widely accepted, those astrologers should also cater to the public's theory in time. The point is that many people themselves don't agree with their new constellations.