Constellation False _ Constellation Kamen Rider

Whether astrology is a science or a superstition has never been less controversial. Many astrologers try to find scientific proof and evidence, while scientists try to drive this freak out. Although there are tens of millions of constellation lovers, it seems that there are always some people who will have a little lack of confidence before entering the hall of science. In fact, if we look at the existing scientific system, astrology can hardly be defined as science. The existing scientific system needs strict measurement and quantifiable standards, and is established through repeated objective experiments. Although astrology system is an accumulation of experience, it is a subjective system rather than an objective system. Take the double-blind experiment that has been criticized by people. First of all, the so-called senior astrologers involved are not well-known. I don't know if they are really talented, or if they are just as famous as Vivian, a constellation witch in Taiwan Province Province, and just amateurs in astrology. In addition, a person's language expression is different, and everyone's self-cognition is also different. What's more, people are born with a protective attitude, easy to accept the good and reject the bad. Besides, many nouns themselves are relative. For example, introversion and extroversion are not absolute standards, but relative standards. Perhaps the typical Pisces is more extroverted than the typical Scorpio, but it is different from the typical Sagittarius. Maybe this person has met a happy event recently and looks a lot more outgoing; And a very happy person is experiencing a trough, or he may be pessimistic and world-weary. So, how can we give an objective evaluation to animals like people? Scientists, who can build such a complex life system? You astrologer, insisting on 100% monitoring can only be scolded. What's more, any forecasting system is more about analyzing a possible curve law, and further inferring and narrowing its results through some practical experience and the other party's social situation, family situation and age situation. Prediction itself is very unpredictable. Just like weather forecast and stock market experts, I haven't seen many that can be completely accurate. At least the Meteorological Bureau is a scientific institution recognized by the state, and it costs hundreds of millions every year. It also dare not say that every detail is 100% accurate. Astrology or horoscope, the tool model itself is quite macro, and there must be data bias. According to physics, this is called systematic error, which is inevitable. Coupled with the possibility of human error, like any discipline, there are mistakes and inaccuracies. Therefore, objectively, some astrologers or prophets exaggerate their predictive ability, which leads to the suspicion of others. This, too, brings shame to yourself. Don't blame others. Too much bragging will bring bad luck. The prediction system is quite accurate in judging the general direction and the overall destiny trend. However, if you go out every day, you must be accurate enough to meet something, then you really can't do it. To tell the truth, it would be amazing if an astrologer could master more than 80% details of a fate. In fact, no one can make such an accurate prediction. It is precisely because of this that it is strange to break into the scientific circle without being typed out by others. Human science? This is an era of advocating science, but advocating is not the same as the era of science. Science is not equal to truth, and science cannot be the only criterion for people to do things. Take the people living around us for example, there are many unscientific places. For example, science tells us that skipping breakfast is harmful to health. How many people don't eat breakfast at all in the morning? For example, science tells us that smoking is harmful to health. Tobacco is now a super-large industry, and countless people expect it to make a fortune. Meeting and offering cigarettes is also a way for China people to entertain guests, and smoking Chinese cigarettes is a symbol of taste. For example, science also tells us that eating too much fried food and barbecue is easy to get cancer. I think KFC and McDonald's are still deeply rooted in the hearts of people all over the world, and the mutton skewers in the streets of boiled fish in restaurants are still delicious. Besides, is The Romance of the Three Kingdoms scientific? Many stories are simply fabricated. But people like to listen and watch, and it has become a unique culture of the Three Kingdoms. Is the TV we watch every day scientific? It is nothing more than a subjectively magnified story, deliberately creating suspense to attract people. So, if someone says that we live in a scientific age, it is true; But if we live in a scientific world, it is all wet. Science is the mainstream of this era, but besides science, we also have culture, customs, morality and emotion. None of this has much to do with science. Perhaps they can spread and develop better with the help of scientific means, but in essence, there is no science. So is astrology. Its software and system are spread through many scientific methods and the most modern Internet. However, instead of throwing it into the science pile as a doormat. It's better to play unscientific. I won't join your science, and you have no right to call me pseudoscience. As for superstition, what is superstition? Is to blindly believe who and who? We use it with a try. Besides, you criticize superstition, why don't you tear down the temple? Isn't Guanyin Bodhisattva superstitious? You believe in science, why don't you close the tobacco company? Isn't tobacco more harmful to human health? If we humans really live strictly according to scientific standards, I dare say that it will be an absolute disaster and catastrophe, and human life will be no fun at all. So, don't be serious. When astrology and constellations have a large number of fans and learners, the simple sentence that superstition and pseudoscience want to hit people is purely picking soft persimmons. Don't these people know that temples and tobacco companies are even worse? They are just not to be taunted! Therefore, this also objectively reminds us that if astrology wants to develop, it is impossible to stand up straight and not be commercialized. Having said so much about the hypothesis of astrology, it does not mean that astrology has no scientific elements at all, but is largely based on the premise that non-existent science can explain it. The following is my opinion: there is an important experiment in physics called pendulum experiment. In a vacuum room, there are pendulums of different sizes, and each pendulum swings at a different amplitude at first. After ignoring them and letting them swing freely for a period of time, it is found that the frequencies of all pendulums begin to converge, and the small pendulums tend to the frequencies of the big pendulums. Then, if we assume that the universe is a vacuum room (it is indeed vacuum), different cosmic galaxies are different pendulums. The Milky Way, the solar system, the earth, or larger cosmic galaxies may indeed have different frequencies where the universe was born. But with their operation and interaction, they will inevitably reach the same frequency. When there are some changes in one system, another system will inevitably respond. For example, our most common tidal phenomenon, the four seasons of the earth, can be found in the universe. So as individuals, we can also be regarded as the smallest pendulum, so its own operation can't escape the influence of the earth, the sun and the moon. If someone claims to be able to escape, please throw him into space as garbage. It is precisely because of the influence of large systems on small systems that human destiny can be observed through the changes of the stars in the universe. In this way, there are two questions: 1, why do stars affect people, not people? 2. Even if people's objective body is affected, how can subjective feelings be judged by the stars? The first question is simple. Mr Einstein put forward the famous theory of relativity, e (energy) =M (mass) times the square of c (speed of light). This is a hypothesis, but we can all understand the elements inside, which means that the energy is related to the mass and speed of the object. Well, the solar system is a celestial body with countless times the mass relative to human beings (not to mention the solar system, that is, the earth), and its running speed is absolutely beyond the reach of human beings. So it produces far more energy than human beings, and it has accumulated for tens of millions of years. In the face of such huge energy, are we human beings affected more or less? The second question, what is subjective emotion? Is subjective feeling produced out of thin air? Anyone who has studied philosophy knows that. The supervisor's emotion comes from the perception of objective things. Therefore, when the stars affect the objective world of human beings, subjective feelings are naturally affected. In fact, in ancient China, there has long been a saying that "heaven and man are one", which is consistent with the cosmology I mentioned above. However, with the current scientific means of mankind, it is impossible to demonstrate whether this theory is established. However, through a lot of experiments and attempts, it is found that it does exist. Just like 1+ 1=2 has not been proved, but mathematics is still widely used; It can't be said that people won't go to astrology unless the hypothesis is proved. Moreover, when science develops to a high level, it is more of a prediction and hypothesis. The earliest Heliocentrism and the present theory of relativity are still a hypothesis. Besides, in the final analysis, the world is discrete and uncertain, which I think people who want to study quantum physics should understand best. Therefore, people who defend science, people who jump out to scold the street, have only some poor scientific knowledge in their hands. It is more accurate to say that they are the guardians of science than that they are the guardians of science. Of course, in a developing country with a majority of farmers and a relatively poor education level, these defenders of popular science still have their positive significance, but they are a little self-righteous inside and outside. Therefore, astrologers, if they have not lost their minds, do not need to get involved in the pool of existing science. It is the key to understand the astrological system, improve one's level and study more practical examples.